A heated press briefing last Friday, March 13, 2026, by U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia Jeanine Pirro has fueled rumors she might be lining up to replace Attorney General Pam Bondi, according to analysis from CNN’s chief legal affairs correspondent Paula Reid.
Pirro made a forceful public statement after U.S. District Judge James Boasberg blocked grand jury subpoenas her office issued to the Federal Reserve in an inquiry involving Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell. The decision, dated midweek and unsealed on Friday, dealt a major blow to Pirro’s investigation into the multibillion-dollar overhaul of the Federal Reserve’s Washington, D.C. headquarters and Powell’s Senate Banking Committee testimony about the project.
Reid said the confrontational press appearance seemed to serve a purpose beyond responding to the court ruling.
“[The press conference] appeared to be an audition for the top job at the Justice Department, because we know that President Trump is very frustrated,” Reid said. “He has expressed frustration with prosecutors at the Justice Department that they have not been able to successfully prosecute his political adversaries.”
Bondi, the current attorney general, has reportedly lost standing with President Donald Trump and some congressional Republicans. According to early March reporting cited by Politico, numerous Republican lawmakers have criticized Bondi over her management of the Jeffrey Epstein records. The Justice Department has also been criticized after unsuccessful prosecutions involving former FBI director James Comey and New York Attorney General Letitia James.
Reid characterized Bondi as being “on thin ice with the White House and with President Donald Trump,” pointing out that Trump has a pattern of removing Cabinet officials who lose support among Republican leaders.
At the Friday news conference, Pirro blasted Judge Boasberg’s order as “outrageous,” arguing that Powell had been improperly shielded from scrutiny. “Jerome Powell today is now bathed in immunity, preventing my office from investigating the Federal Reserve,” Pirro said. “This is wrong, and it is without legal authority.”
Pirro said she would appeal the ruling, even though Reid believes the appeal faces long odds. The judge’s opinion was strongly critical of the prosecutors’ intentions.
“Did prosecutors issue those subpoenas for a proper purpose? The Court finds that they did not,” Judge Boasberg wrote in his decision. He added that abundant evidence suggested the subpoenas’ purpose was “to harass and pressure Powell either to yield to the president or to resign and make way for a Fed Chair who will.”
Pirro’s resume is distinctive: she has served as a district judge, a television judge, and a longtime Fox News host before taking on the role of U.S. attorney. Her aggressive media persona and outspoken support for Trump have made her a prominent political presence.
Reid suggested Pirro’s combative tone at the briefing matches the kind of prosecutor Trump prefers.
The CNN correspondent noted, though, that Trump-aligned prosecutors have “overall not been successful” in trying to use the courts against the president’s political foes, but Pirro is showing Trump that she is trying.
White House spokeswoman Abigail Jackson defended Bondi when asked about the speculation, saying that Trump “has full faith in the attorney general.”
Even with the White House’s public backing, the mix of congressional discontent, high-profile prosecutorial setbacks, and Trump’s documented dissatisfaction with Justice Department results has left Bondi’s future uncertain. Whether Pirro’s public performance on Friday was a genuine bid for the attorney general post or simply her usual prosecutorial approach remains ambiguous, but Reid’s take has increased speculation about possible leadership changes at the Justice Department.
